<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://richmondsql.org/cs2007/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'mirror', 'failover', and 'error'</title><link>http://richmondsql.org/cs2007/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=mirror,failover,error&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'mirror', 'failover', and 'error'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Comparing SQL Mirroring to Clustering</title><link>http://richmondsql.org/cs2007/forums/p/18/19.aspx#19</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:33:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2e8a3759-4cfd-4c9f-8103-2483fc393c1e:19</guid><dc:creator>wkhazzard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="courier new,courier"&gt;I&amp;#39;d like to hear the thoughts of other DBAs and Architects who&amp;#39;ve used both SQL Mirroring and SQL Clustering. My company, SnagAJob.com, is currently using SQL Mirroring for our production OLTP databases. We have issues almost every day: mysterious failovers, ADO.NET clients that repeatedly attempt to connect to the mirrored server instead of the primary (because they believe it&amp;#39;s failed over). We&amp;#39;re fairly certain that it&amp;#39;s not networking issues because we see these same issues in our lab environment when everything is connected on a single gigabit switch. This would be a great topic for a future meeting, in my opinion, especially as more of a round-table type of discussion.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>